Ectoplasm by Batchen The vast majority of this reading is based around the idea that photography is a dying art form. Soon the medium itself will be an unnecessary means of expression or information provider. Just like its predecessor (painting and drawing) it has been replaced by computerized images. “unable to spot the “fake” from the “real”, viewers will increasingly discard their faith in the photograph’s ability to deliver objective truth.” This entertains the idea that because of a photograph’s mysterious or illusional appearance, people’s inherent need for concrete truth and facts, will lose interest in it’s distinguished expressive format. Batchen also states that with the combination of it’s epistemological failure, and it’s being replaced by computers and other more advanced forms of technology, our present society wouldn’t find a need for photography any longer, aesthetically or for daily knowledge. This to me is a very scary concept. Although I am not sure whether I agree or disagree with this potential reality. I understand how it could fail as a sufficient source of information, but at the same time I don’t think because a picture could possibly be misleading, that our desire for stimulating imagery would decrease. Another point of focus was how photography has always been associated with death since it’s birth. Many people believe that each time your photo is taken, it steals a part of your soul, and after so many photos are taken, very little of the person you remains. This is a theory that has been discussed for ages, and resulted in multiple cultures finding photography an evil medium since it’s origin. By bringing up this topic of discussion, is Batchen implying that due to this belief, that certain cultures would find the discontinuiation of photography a positive thing? Do these societies find other art mediums (such as visual illustration, painting, and even computer graphics ) more acceptable?
Photography: Theory & Criticism will examine historic and contemporary philosophical, aesthetic, and epistemological topics addressing the evolution of theories germane to contemporary photographic discourse. As a class, we will address structuralism, post-structuralism, deconstruction, semiotics, and the taxonomy of visual representation from simulacrum to social classification analysis. Conceptual understanding and the successful application of the topics addressed throughout this course are designed to further develop your photographic lexicon. The application of thoughtful, theory-based ideas can be employed to promote visual solutions to challenges in the design, execution, and creation of your work. Theories and topics discussed in the readings will be introduced with supporting imagery for discussion and debate. Active discussion and participation are core requirements of this course.
COURSE OBJECTIVES:
This course is designed to introduce critical theory and foster the understanding of multiple expectations/interpretations and potential message(s) contained within the photographic image. By deconstructing the conceptual design, formal elements, and the ever-evolving cultural architecture requisite to a contemporary visual language, we will develop the required skill sets to actively seek qualified meaning beyond an image’s superficial mimetic qualities. The ideas, theories, philosophies, and positions expressed by the assigned authors are subject to sensitive trends within ethnographical movements. Through multiple writing exercises, interviewing artists and critics, and attending gallery/museum exhibitions, we will define and articulate points of long-term personal aesthetic/conceptual interest.
TEACHING ASISTANT:
FRANCES JAKUBEK
The teaching assistant will provide structural support for all class discussion topics, assist with logistical preparation, and participate in the on-going critical analysis of readings, written reviews, and presentations. Ms. Jakubek’s position is to be informative and knowledgeable on all subject matter addressed in class, accessible for project-related conceptual development, and to respectfully challenge the integrity of your work in all of its manifestations.
This semester, Ms. Jakubek will be leading select critical discussions, as well as supporting lecture(s) on critical/theoretical essays in conjunction with on-going class curriculum.
If you have any questions for or regarding your teaching assistant, please feel free to contact me or Ms. Jakubek.
COURSE CONTENT:
Readings, presentations, papers, reviews, and class participation are the primary curriculum-based assignments. Additional research to qualify independent papers and projects will be contingent upon the identified subject matter, and at your discretion. Assignments:
Readings: This course will focus on the academic discourse of photography as a medium, ethnographic measure, and emotional outlet, and will address the power structure within political and social confines. The majority of our classes will be dedicated to response, support, and/or deconstruction of essays provided in class. It is critical that all assigned readings are completed prior to class to promote qualified discussions on identified subjects.
Research Paper & Presentation: One self-defined presentation will be required. This presentation must be forty-five minutes in length and accompanied by supporting media (PowerPoint, video, web, or alternative sources to support your thesis). Relevant reading(s) must be distributed one-week prior to your presentation to establish general interest/context. The presentation will enable you to explore a genre, aesthetic philosophy, artistic movement (visual/conceptual/other), introduce multiple perspectives on your selected text, and establish a dialogue on the topic introduced.
Class Participation: Due to the nature of this course, participation, discussion, and debate on all subject matter will be critical to the development of ideas. Interdisciplinary approaches are employed to encourage individualized understanding and unique interpretations of the philosophies addressed in/outside of class and will not be exclusively object-based.
It is expected that all reading, notes, points of debate, written responses, as well as personal evaluation(s), are completed prior to class without exception.
Paper(s): All papers and blog entries will be evaluated on the comprehension of subject matter, qualification of personal perspective, and the creative and thoughtful approaches to the presentation of your ideas.
Oh-yeah… Exhibitions, openings, and events are to be attended regularly independent from scheduled class trips and identified NEiA visiting lectures. View work critically and seek additional information from galleries, museums, and events whenever possible. Supporting material contributes to the advancement of ones understanding and experience of the work. You are encouraged to bring to class discoveries of new images, artists, or ideas. These topics will always be addressed in class or independently with the instructor.
Class Policies:
Any student who has special needs that may affect his or her performance in this class is asked to identify his/her needs to the instructor in private by the end of the first day of class.
Instructor Availability Outside of Class:
Messages may be left for the instructor on voice mail or via email. Office hours will be announced. All appointments may be scheduled at instructor/student convenience.
Other Class Policies:
You are expected to conduct yourselves in a professional manner demonstrating great respect for self, peers, and faculty. The classroom is an open environment for the sharing of thoughts, beliefs, and ideas as well as the acceptance/tolerance of perspectives that may conflict with your own. Intolerance, disrespect, or belligerent behavior will not be tolerated and faculty reserves the right to intervene at any point.
Attitude and presentation (of self and ideas) are critical aspects of what we do as professionals. Conduct yourself in a manner that reflects these principals.
Academic Support/Learning Disabilities:
Students with known disabilities should contact their instructors as well as the Student Services Office. Academic Support (tutoring) is provided to any student in need of tutoring. Students who feel they are able to assist with tutoring this course should also contact their instructor and/or the Academic Support Center.
1 comment:
Hannah Wiessner:
Week 4
Ectoplasm by Batchen
The vast majority of this reading is based around the idea that photography is a dying art form. Soon the medium itself will be an unnecessary means of expression or information provider. Just like its predecessor (painting and drawing) it has been replaced by computerized images. “unable to spot the “fake” from the “real”, viewers will increasingly discard their faith in the photograph’s ability to deliver objective truth.” This entertains the idea that because of a photograph’s mysterious or illusional appearance, people’s inherent need for concrete truth and facts, will lose interest in it’s distinguished expressive format. Batchen also states that with the combination of it’s epistemological failure, and it’s being replaced by computers and other more advanced forms of technology, our present society wouldn’t find a need for photography any longer, aesthetically or for daily knowledge. This to me is a very scary concept. Although I am not sure whether I agree or disagree with this potential reality. I understand how it could fail as a sufficient source of information, but at the same time I don’t think because a picture could possibly be misleading, that our desire for stimulating imagery would decrease.
Another point of focus was how photography has always been associated with death since it’s birth. Many people believe that each time your photo is taken, it steals a part of your soul, and after so many photos are taken, very little of the person you remains. This is a theory that has been discussed for ages, and resulted in multiple cultures finding photography an evil medium since it’s origin. By bringing up this topic of discussion, is Batchen implying that due to this belief, that certain cultures would find the discontinuiation of photography a positive thing? Do these societies find other art mediums (such as visual illustration, painting, and even computer graphics ) more acceptable?
Post a Comment