Monday, October 13, 2008

de Certeau, de Man, and Jay

The Arts of Theory by Michel de Certeau

Resistance to Theory by Paul de Man

Threshold - The Disturbing Image: A Survivalist Guide to Contemporary Photography by Bill Jay

2 comments:

Doolin said...

Caitlyn Doolin
Week Five

Occam’s Razor – Bill Jay
Threshold – The Disturbing Image

Bill Jay begins is essay with a descriptive paragraph of a cigarette being put out in a plate of food. He states that the most disturbing part of that was the smell of the burnt cabbage. He moves on to discuss how photographers do not willfully cause discomfort or mean to shock viewers. Then Jay defines disturbing into two parts: (1) how the image pushes the viewer to limit their emotion: eventually causing rejection. Then two sub groups; personally shocking and generally shocking. (2) The image “rocks the status quo and breaks the order of things.”
Jay talks about how humans have the instinct to survive but with any threat will fill “humans” with panic. This will lead the humans’ stimuli into an extreme reaction, such as continuations. I am not exactly sure what that means but the next couple paragraphs were very interesting. For example, the evolutionary urge is to procreate, grow increasingly complex, adapt to the environment, and expand consciousness. I understand procreation is what we, humans, are “really” here on earth for but I was just taken back when I read it. I agree with Jay, especially when he begins to discuss that we are actively seeking violence and sex on television, movies, and books. Which in return, an anxious and disturbed viewer makes a good consumer, which makes sense because by disturbing the viewer you are making create emotions of only fear and shock them. Also, he states “photography allows us to approach the cliff-edge with out physical risk.” I can relate to this personally, this is the main reason why I love horror or severely disturbing films because it’s like being at the location and time without being there. And as for the second part of disturbing, I feel like it was about “how photographs that view unsettling to us, is signals that the medium is vigorous and energetic no matter how much we loathe them personally.” No matter what a photograph looks like, it’s not concerned with the photographer’s motives or lapse in good taste.

The Practice of Everyday Life – Micheal de Certeau
Chapter V - The Arts of Theory

Michel de Certeau begins the article talking about theorist Faucalt and Bourideu, which he then discuses their articulations a discourse on non-discursive practices. Which I felt that he was trying to say that the theorist’s ideas were not acceptable to him. Then he starts to talk about how the process of theories can be a recipe in cooking. There are two alternative “ways of making” a theory. First, “cut it out”, which means take out the idea from the details, then “turn over”, which means to construct a new theory from the old. De Certeau moves on to talk about how the difference, between operations , no longer refers to a set of theories and practices but now, speculations and applications of distinction.
The 'know how' is associated with having knowledge. It is composed of of many but wild operations. The distinctions between art and science are that science is the operational language, that uses grammar and syntax form constructed by systems and the arts are technique that waits for knowledge that they currently lack. But they now are no less helpful, because techniques which can even be automatic. De Certeau speaks about the key technique of art theory is to manage and find the understanding of the narrative. This led to the educated knowledge to understanding.

The Resistance to Theory – Paul de Man

M.H.Tucker said...

Occam's Razor - Bill Jay

What is disturbing? I agree with Bill Jay that almost any photograph could be seen as disturbing to someone, at some time. What someone considers good taste is completely subjective due to that fact that we, as a people, are not the same. We were not all brought up with the same moral codes, nor do we share the same personal histories. Images dealing with sex and violence seem to be a constant source of disturbing images, but it would be ignorant to say that "everyone" is offended by them. In fact, if anything, the more we are bombarded with these images, the more we become desensitized to them. "The source of much disturbance is created by the words which accompany the image - with the image making words up-close, real and actual." (pg. 39). It's true that our interpretation of any image changes with text, not just disturbing images. Why is that? Why does our connotation of an image change with only the addition of a few words?

The Resistance to Theory - Paul de Man

Why do we feel the need to resist theory? "The resistance of theory is a resistance to the use of language about language." (pg. 13). Is this because more often than not we are unsure of what we are reading? When we are unsure, we develop our own connotations as to what something means and can find ourselves reading something that wasn't even there. In a sense I felt like that during this reading. Personally, I had a hard time understanding this reading. Perhaps this is due to my own misunderstanding of words, or lack of knowledge as to definitions. Either way, I did not fully understand this reading.